Difference between revisions of "Table:Infosphere user"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Trickymaster (talk | contribs) (→Ballot: add tricky) |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| | | | ||
*[[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] ([[User talk:Sanfazer|talk]]) | *[[User:Sanfazer|Sanfazer]] ([[User talk:Sanfazer|talk]]) | ||
*[[User:Trickymaster|Trickymaster]] ([[User talk:Trickymaster|talk]]) | |||
|| | || | ||
*[[User:Buddy13|Buddy13]] ([[User talk:Buddy13|talk]]) | *[[User:Buddy13|Buddy13]] ([[User talk:Buddy13|talk]]) |
Revision as of 04:39, 28 November 2011
Ballot
Infospherian | Infospheroid | Infospheran |
---|---|---|
|
Discussion
A Wikipedia user is a Wikipedian, but what is an Infosphere user? An Infospherian? An Infospheric? An Infospheroid? I don't know. Apparently, we don't have a name. And we need one, don't we?
I propose creating a project page similar to this one, only smaller. Of the three names that I mentioned, I like Infospherian the most. What about you?
Feel free to suggest other names. Sanfazer (talk) 20:10, 7 November 2011 (CET)
- Personally, I find most Wikipedians to be self-righteous assholes. (The robot devil said "That's alright, you can say that here.") I like "Spheroid" or "Spheronian" ... There are so many suffixes we could affix to "Infosphere"... 'spherite. 'spheron. 'spheroid. 'spherian. 'spheronian. 'spheritis. 'spherephobia. 'spherosis. 'spheritudinal. Wait, I think I got off track somewhere in there... *wanders off* --Buddy (talk) 10:38, 12 November 2011 (CET)
- I blame that on grammar. And this tie on all editors who don't opine. Who will step forward and save us from this uncertainty?!? And by us I mean... Sanfazer (talk) 19:39, 12 November 2011 (CET)
- I'm legally prohibited from relieving uncertainty. However, I do like to opine, and I think that "Infospheran" sounds good. -- DeepSpaceHomer (talk) 04:11, 13 November 2011 (CET)
- I blame that on grammar. And this tie on all editors who don't opine. Who will step forward and save us from this uncertainty?!? And by us I mean... Sanfazer (talk) 19:39, 12 November 2011 (CET)
- Perhaps a vote is in order? Can we do a vote with more than two options? --Buddy (talk) 07:59, 13 November 2011 (CET)
- Deep. Do you mean Infospherian?
- Buddy. We can, but, as far as I know, not with templates such as Infosphere:Accept. I've taken the liberty to add a ballot box. Sanfazer (talk) 19:17, 13 November 2011 (CET)
- No, I meant "Infospheran", like "Roman". Sounds better to my ears. -- DeepSpaceHomer (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2011 (CET)
- Oh. Okay then. It's been added to the box. Sanfazer (talk) 21:13, 13 November 2011 (CET)
- As it isn't simply yes/no, I'd rather see this done in the form of preferential voting, wherein all voters can assign each option a rank, first choice given a 1 and so on, then the item with least votes has all it's votes reassigned to the voter's next preference. Quolnok (talk) 04:35, 14 November 2011 (CET)
- Oh. Okay then. It's been added to the box. Sanfazer (talk) 21:13, 13 November 2011 (CET)
- No, I meant "Infospheran", like "Roman". Sounds better to my ears. -- DeepSpaceHomer (talk) 20:22, 13 November 2011 (CET)